Hy4 vs Pareto
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Hy4 is 6.0× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Hy4 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
| Hy4 | Pareto | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.42 | $2.50 |
| Output price / 1M | $1.25 | $7.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.63 | $3.75 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.021 | $0.25 |
| Context window | 1M | 262K |
| Max output | 66K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 34.6 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 1 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-04 | 2026-09-17 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Hy4 or Pareto?
Hy4 is 6.0× cheaper than Pareto on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Hy4 vs Pareto: which has a bigger context window?
Hy4: 1,048,576 tokens. Pareto: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy4 ≈ $1,459, Pareto ≈ $8,750.
More comparisons
Hy4 vs Gemini 4 CarbonHy4 vs Claude Fable 5.2Hy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashHy4 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashHy4 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalHy4 vs GPT-6.1 TerraHy4 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProHy4 vs Kimi K3.1 ProHy4 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashHy4 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Hy4 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLHy4 vs Gemini 4 ArgonHy4 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Hy4 vs Nano Banana 2.1Hy4 vs Mistral Large 4Hy4 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProPareto vs Gemini 4 CarbonPareto vs Claude Fable 5.2Pareto vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashPareto vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashPareto vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalPareto vs GPT-6.1 TerraPareto vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProPareto vs Kimi K3.1 Pro