Llama 4 Scout vs Switchyard
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 1M).
| Llama 4 Scout | Switchyard | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.10 | — |
| Output price / 1M | $0.30 | — |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.15 | — |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 1.3M | 1M |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 8.2 | — |
| Providers | 4 | 0 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2026-09-21 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Switchyard?
Llama 4 Scout and Switchyard are priced identically.
Llama 4 Scout vs Switchyard: which has a bigger context window?
Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Switchyard: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00, Switchyard ≈ $0.
More comparisons
Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 TerraLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLlama 4 Scout vs Kimi K3.1 ProLlama 4 Scout vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLlama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Haiku 5.5Llama 4 Scout vs Nano Banana 2.1Llama 4 Scout vs Mistral Large 4Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 SolLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Sonnet 5.5Llama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Command A+Switchyard vs GPT-6.1 TerraSwitchyard vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProSwitchyard vs Kimi K3.1 ProSwitchyard vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashSwitchyard vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Switchyard vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLSwitchyard vs Gemini 4 ArgonSwitchyard vs Claude Haiku 5.5