Llama 4 Scout vs Step 3.7 Flash
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 2.9× cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
| Llama 4 Scout | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.10 | $0.20 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.30 | $1.15 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.15 | $0.44 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.04 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 262K |
| Max output | 16K | 230K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 8.2 | 39.6 |
| Providers | 4 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2026-05-28 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Step 3.7 Flash?
Llama 4 Scout is 2.9× cheaper than Step 3.7 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Llama 4 Scout vs Step 3.7 Flash: which has a bigger context window?
Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Step 3.7 Flash: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00, Step 3.7 Flash ≈ $975.00.
More comparisons
Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 CarbonLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Fable 5.2Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Hy4Llama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 TerraLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLlama 4 Scout vs Kimi K3.1 ProLlama 4 Scout vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLlama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Haiku 5.5Llama 4 Scout vs Nano Banana 2.1Llama 4 Scout vs Mistral Large 4Step 3.7 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonStep 3.7 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2Step 3.7 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashStep 3.7 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashStep 3.7 Flash vs Hy4Step 3.7 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalStep 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraStep 3.7 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro