Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 30B A3B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 30% cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 41K).
| Llama 4 Scout | Qwen3 30B A3B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.10 | $0.12 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.15 | $0.21 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | — |
| Context window | 1.3M | 41K |
| Max output | 16K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 8.2 | — |
| Providers | 4 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2025-04-28 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Qwen3 30B A3B?
Llama 4 Scout is 30% cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen3 30B A3B: which has a bigger context window?
Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B: 40,960 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00, Qwen3 30B A3B ≈ $490.00.
More comparisons
Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 CarbonLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Fable 5.2Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Hy4Llama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 TerraLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLlama 4 Scout vs Kimi K3.1 ProLlama 4 Scout vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLlama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Haiku 5.5Llama 4 Scout vs Nano Banana 2.1Llama 4 Scout vs Mistral Large 4Qwen3 30B A3B vs Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3 30B A3B vs Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3 30B A3B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3 30B A3B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3 30B A3B vs Hy4Qwen3 30B A3B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3 30B A3B vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3 30B A3B vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro