Llama 4 Scout vs Mercury 2
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Llama 4 Scout is 2.5× cheaper than Mercury 2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 128K).
| Llama 4 Scout | Mercury 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.10 | $0.25 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.30 | $0.75 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.15 | $0.38 |
| Cached input / 1M | — | $0.025 |
| Context window | 1.3M | 128K |
| Max output | 16K | 50K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 8.2 | 31.1 |
| Providers | 4 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2025-04-05 | 2026-03-04 |
| Retirement | — | 2026-11-08 |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Mercury 2?
Llama 4 Scout is 2.5× cheaper than Mercury 2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Llama 4 Scout vs Mercury 2: which has a bigger context window?
Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens. Mercury 2: 128,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00, Mercury 2 ≈ $875.00.
More comparisons
Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 CarbonLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Fable 5.2Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Hy4Llama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 TerraLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLlama 4 Scout vs Kimi K3.1 ProLlama 4 Scout vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Llama 4 Scout vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLlama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 ArgonLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Haiku 5.5Llama 4 Scout vs Nano Banana 2.1Llama 4 Scout vs Mistral Large 4Mercury 2 vs Gemini 4 CarbonMercury 2 vs Claude Fable 5.2Mercury 2 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMercury 2 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMercury 2 vs Hy4Mercury 2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMercury 2 vs GPT-6.1 TerraMercury 2 vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro