Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Meta Llama

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.027 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Meta Llama
MiniMax
Verdict: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 3.7× cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 60K).
Llama 3.2 1B InstructMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.027$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.20$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.0705$0.26
Cached input / 1M—$0.015
Context window60K1M
Max output54K524K
Intelligence index—29.1
Coding index——
Providers—11
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2024-09-252026-10-19
Retirement2026-11-20—

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 3.7× cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: 60,000 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct ≈ $154.50, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00.

More comparisons