DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017

DeepSeek
$0.098 / $0.29
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.027 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
DeepSeek
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 2.1× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 has the larger context window (1M vs 60K).
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.098$0.027
Output price / 1M$0.29$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.15$0.0705
Cached input / 1M$0.0029—
Context window1M60K
Max output393K54K
Intelligence index28.6—
Coding index——
Providers47—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-172024-09-25
Retirement—2026-11-20

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 2.1× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: 60,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 ≈ $343.00, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct ≈ $154.50.

More comparisons