Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Nano Banana 2.1

Google
$1.50 / $7.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.027 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 42.6× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nano Banana 2.1 has the larger context window (66K vs 60K).
Nano Banana 2.1Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.027
Output price / 1M$7.50$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$3.00$0.0705
Cached input / 1M——
Context window66K60K
Max output59K54K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-062024-09-25
Retirement—2026-11-20

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2.1 or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 42.6× cheaper than Nano Banana 2.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Nano Banana 2.1 vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Nano Banana 2.1: 65,536 tokens. Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: 60,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Nano Banana 2.1 ≈ $6,750, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct ≈ $154.50.

More comparisons