Gemini 4 Argon vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini 4 Argon

Google
$2.00 / $10.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.027 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 56.7× cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Gemini 4 Argon has the larger context window (1M vs 60K).
Gemini 4 ArgonLlama 3.2 1B Instruct
Input price / 1M$2.00$0.027
Output price / 1M$10.00$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$4.00$0.0705
Cached input / 1M$0.10—
Context window1M60K
Max output944K54K
Intelligence index50.4—
Coding index——
Providers6—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-132024-09-25
Retirement—2026-11-20

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 56.7× cheaper than Gemini 4 Argon on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini 4 Argon vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini 4 Argon: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: 60,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini 4 Argon ≈ $9,000, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct ≈ $154.50.

More comparisons