GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.027 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 8.4× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal has the larger context window (1M vs 60K).
GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLlama 3.2 1B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.027
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.0705
Cached input / 1M$0.075—
Context window1M60K
Max output131K54K
Intelligence index——
Coding index——
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-11-022024-09-25
Retirement—2026-11-20

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 8.4× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal: 1,048,576 tokens. Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: 60,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal ≈ $1,365, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct ≈ $154.50.

More comparisons