Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Meta Llama

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct

Meta Llama
$0.027 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Meta Llama
Verdict: Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 2.8× cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 60K).
Claude Haiku 5.5Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.027
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.0705
Cached input / 1M$0.01—
Context window1M60K
Max output128K54K
Intelligence index36.5—
Coding index——
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-10-072024-09-25
Retirement—2026-11-20

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Llama 3.2 1B Instruct?

Llama 3.2 1B Instruct is 2.8× cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Llama 3.2 1B Instruct: 60,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct ≈ $154.50.

More comparisons