Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Tiny

inclusionAI
$0.015 / $0.045
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.20 / $2.40
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
inclusionAI
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Tiny is 33.3× cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Tiny has the larger context window (262K vs 82K).
Ling 3.0 TinyQwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507
Input price / 1M$0.015$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.045$2.40
Blended price (3:1)$0.0225$0.75
Cached input / 1M$0.003—
Context window262K82K
Max output250K33K
Intelligence index—9.8
Coding index26.512.1
Providers——
Best provider uptime (30m)——
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-062025-08-28
Retirement—2026-10-09

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Tiny or Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507?

Ling 3.0 Tiny is 33.3× cheaper than Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Tiny: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507: 81,920 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Tiny ≈ $52.50, Qwen3 30B A3B Thinking 2507 ≈ $1,600.

More comparisons