Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Tiny

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Haiku 5.5

Anthropic
$0.10 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Tiny

inclusionAI
$0.015 / $0.045
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
inclusionAI
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Tiny is 8.9× cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Haiku 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Haiku 5.5Ling 3.0 Tiny
Input price / 1M$0.10$0.015
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.045
Blended price (3:1)$0.20$0.0225
Cached input / 1M$0.01$0.003
Context window1M262K
Max output128K250K
Intelligence index36.5—
Coding index—26.5
Providers10—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-072026-08-06
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Haiku 5.5 or Ling 3.0 Tiny?

Ling 3.0 Tiny is 8.9× cheaper than Claude Haiku 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Haiku 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Tiny: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Haiku 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Tiny: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Haiku 5.5 ≈ $450.00, Ling 3.0 Tiny ≈ $52.50.

More comparisons