Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Tiny is 6.7× cheaper than Llama 4 Scout on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.015 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.045 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0225 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.003 | — |
| Context window | 262K | 1.3M |
| Max output | 250K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 26.5 | 8.2 |
| Providers | — | 4 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 100.0% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-06 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Tiny or Llama 4 Scout?
Ling 3.0 Tiny is 6.7× cheaper than Llama 4 Scout on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
Ling 3.0 Tiny: 262,144 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Tiny ≈ $52.50, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini 4 CarbonLing 3.0 Tiny vs Claude Fable 5.2Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLing 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLing 3.0 Tiny vs Hy4Ling 3.0 Tiny vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLing 3.0 Tiny vs GPT-6.1 TerraLing 3.0 Tiny vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLing 3.0 Tiny vs Kimi K3.1 ProLing 3.0 Tiny vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLing 3.0 Tiny vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLing 3.0 Tiny vs Gemini 4 ArgonLing 3.0 Tiny vs Claude Haiku 5.5Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Nano Banana 2.1Ling 3.0 Tiny vs Mistral Large 4Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini 4 CarbonLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Fable 5.2Llama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashLlama 4 Scout vs Hy4Llama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 TerraLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro