Ling 3.0 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash is 4.8× cheaper than Llama 4 Scout on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Llama 4 Scout has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
| Ling 3.0 Flash | Llama 4 Scout | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.021 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.063 | $0.30 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0315 | $0.15 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0042 | — |
| Context window | 262K | 1.3M |
| Max output | 33K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | — | — |
| Coding index | 50.6 | 8.2 |
| Providers | — | 3 |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | — | 99.9% |
| Vision input | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-07-23 | 2025-04-05 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash or Llama 4 Scout?
Ling 3.0 Flash is 4.8× cheaper than Llama 4 Scout on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Ling 3.0 Flash vs Llama 4 Scout: which has a bigger context window?
Ling 3.0 Flash: 262,144 tokens. Llama 4 Scout: 1,310,720 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash ≈ $73.50, Llama 4 Scout ≈ $350.00.
More comparisons
Ling 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLing 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLing 3.0 Flash vs Command A+Ling 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 LunaLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 Sol ProLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 SolLing 3.0 Flash vs Claude Opus 5.5Ling 3.0 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedLing 3.0 Flash vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs Grok 4.7Ling 3.0 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashXLing 3.0 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 AstraLing 3.0 Flash vs GPT-6 Astra ProLlama 4 Scout vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLlama 4 Scout vs Command A+Llama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Luna ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 LunaLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 Sol ProLlama 4 Scout vs GPT-6 SolLlama 4 Scout vs Claude Opus 5.5