Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

Qwen (Alibaba)
$2.00 / $6.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
inclusionAI
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 33.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (45.4 vs 24.6). Qwen3.8 Max (0902) has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLQwen3.8 Max (0902)
Input price / 1M$0.06$2.00
Output price / 1M$0.18$6.00
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$3.00
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.25
Context window262K1M
Max output33K131K
Intelligence index24.645.4
Coding index5776.2
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-09-03
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Qwen3.8 Max (0902)?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 33.3× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902): which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 Max (0902): 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Qwen3.8 Max (0902) ≈ $7,000.

More comparisons