Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.7 Max

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen (Alibaba)
$1.48 / $4.42
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
inclusionAI
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 24.6× cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (29.5 vs 24.6). Qwen3.7 Max has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLQwen3.7 Max
Input price / 1M$0.06$1.48
Output price / 1M$0.18$4.42
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$2.21
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.29
Context window262K1M
Max output33K131K
Intelligence index24.629.5
Coding index5766
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-05-21
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Qwen3.7 Max?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 24.6× cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.7 Max: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.7 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Qwen3.7 Max ≈ $5,163.

More comparisons