Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.6 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.32 / $2.70
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
Q
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 10.2× cheaper than Qwen3.6 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 21.4).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLQwen3.6 27B
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.32
Output price / 1M$0.18$2.70
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.92
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.15
Context window262K262K
Max output33K262K
Intelligence index24.621.4
Coding index5753.7
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-04-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Qwen3.6 27B?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 10.2× cheaper than Qwen3.6 27B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.6 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.6 27B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Qwen3.6 27B ≈ $1,990.

More comparisons