Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.6 27B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.6 27B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.32 / $2.70
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
Q
Verdict: Qwen3.6 27B is 8.7× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (57.6 vs 21.4). Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Opus 5.5Qwen3.6 27B
Input price / 1M$4.00$0.32
Output price / 1M$20.00$2.70
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$0.92
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.15
Context window1M262K
Max output128K262K
Intelligence index57.621.4
Coding index53.7
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222026-04-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Qwen3.6 27B?

Qwen3.6 27B is 8.7× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Qwen3.6 27B: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3.6 27B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Qwen3.6 27B ≈ $1,990.

More comparisons