Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.5 397B A17B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.55 / $3.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
Q
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 14.3× cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 18.4).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLQwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.55
Output price / 1M$0.18$3.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$1.29
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.23
Context window262K262K
Max output33K236K
Intelligence index24.618.4
Coding index5748.2
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-02-16
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 14.3× cheaper than Qwen3.5 397B A17B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.5 397B A17B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Qwen3.5 397B A17B ≈ $2,850.

More comparisons