Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

NVIDIA
$0.08 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
N
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 18% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash VL scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (24.6 vs 12.9).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLNemotron 3.5 Lightning
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.08
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.11
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.04
Context window262K262K
Max output33K131K
Intelligence index24.612.9
Coding index5726.8
Providers4
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-08-11
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 18% cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Lightning on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ≈ $260.00.

More comparisons