Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Muse Spark 1.1

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Muse Spark 1.1

Meta
$1.25 / $4.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
M
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 22.2× cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Muse Spark 1.1 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (33.7 vs 24.6). Muse Spark 1.1 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLMuse Spark 1.1
Input price / 1M$0.06$1.25
Output price / 1M$0.18$4.25
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$2.00
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.15
Context window262K1M
Max output33K944K
Intelligence index24.633.7
Coding index5771.3
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-07-16
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Muse Spark 1.1?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 22.2× cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Muse Spark 1.1: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. Muse Spark 1.1: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, Muse Spark 1.1 ≈ $4,625.

More comparisons