Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs MiniMax M3

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

inclusionAI

Ling 3.0 Flash VL

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
MiniMax

MiniMax M3

MiniMax
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
inclusionAI
MiniMax
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 5.8× cheaper than MiniMax M3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (29.2 vs 24.6). MiniMax M3 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 Flash VLMiniMax M3
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.18$1.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.52
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.06
Context window262K1M
Max output33K512K
Intelligence index24.629.2
Coding index5758.6
Providers13
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-102026-05-31
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash VL or MiniMax M3?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL is 5.8× cheaper than MiniMax M3 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs MiniMax M3: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash VL: 262,144 tokens. MiniMax M3: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash VL ≈ $210.00, MiniMax M3 ≈ $1,200.

More comparisons