Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Qwen3.7 Max

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen (Alibaba)
$1.48 / $4.42
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
Q
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 24.6× cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.7 Max scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (29.5 vs 22.6). Qwen3.7 Max has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 Flash FinQwen3.7 Max
Input price / 1M$0.06$1.48
Output price / 1M$0.18$4.42
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$2.21
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.29
Context window262K1M
Max output236K131K
Intelligence index22.629.5
Coding index55.666
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-272026-05-21
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or Qwen3.7 Max?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 24.6× cheaper than Qwen3.7 Max on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Qwen3.7 Max: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.7 Max: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $210.00, Qwen3.7 Max ≈ $5,163.

More comparisons