Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI

$0.06 / $0.18

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Qwen3.8 Omni Flash

Qwen (Alibaba)

$0.15 / $0.47

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 2.6× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).

	Ling 3.0 Flash Fin	Qwen3.8 Omni Flash
Input price / 1M	$0.06	$0.15
Output price / 1M	$0.18	$0.47
Blended price (3:1)	$0.09	$0.23
Cached input / 1M	$0.012	$0.016
Context window	262K	1M
Max output	236K	131K
Intelligence index	22.6	—
Coding index	55.6	—
Providers	—	1
Best provider uptime (30m)	—	100.0%
Vision input	No	Yes
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-08-27	2026-09-21
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or Qwen3.8 Omni Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 2.6× cheaper than Qwen3.8 Omni Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens. Qwen3.8 Omni Flash: 1,000,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $210.00, Qwen3.8 Omni Flash ≈ $535.00.

More comparisons