GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 FlashX

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 6.6× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashXLing 3.0 Flash Fin
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.06
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.09$0.012
Context window1M262K
Max output131K236K
Intelligence index22.6
Coding index55.6
Providers1
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-182026-08-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 6.6× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX ≈ $1,365, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons