Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 26.7× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Grok 4.7 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (46.4 vs 22.6). Grok 4.7 has the larger context window (500K vs 262K).
| Grok 4.7 | Ling 3.0 Flash Fin | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.60 | $0.06 |
| Output price / 1M | $4.80 | $0.18 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $2.40 | $0.09 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.40 | $0.012 |
| Context window | 500K | 262K |
| Max output | 450K | 236K |
| Intelligence index | 46.4 | 22.6 |
| Coding index | — | 55.6 |
| Providers | 4 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-08-27 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Grok 4.7 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?
Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 26.7× cheaper than Grok 4.7 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Grok 4.7 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?
Grok 4.7: 500,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Grok 4.7 ≈ $5,600, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $210.00.
More comparisons
Grok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGrok 4.7 vs Command A+Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Luna ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 LunaGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Sol ProGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 SolGrok 4.7 vs Claude Opus 5.5Grok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeedGrok 4.7 vs MiMo-V2.6-FlashGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Omni FlashGrok 4.7 vs GLM 5.3 FlashXGrok 4.7 vs DeepSeek V4.1 FlashGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 AstraGrok 4.7 vs GPT-6 Astra ProGrok 4.7 vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs GLM 5.3 PrimeLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Command A+Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs GPT-6 Luna ProLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs GPT-6 LunaLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs GPT-6 Sol ProLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs GPT-6 SolLing 3.0 Flash Fin vs Claude Opus 5.5