Claude Opus 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

A

Claude Opus 5.5

Anthropic
$4.00 / $20.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
I

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
A
I
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 88.9× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Opus 5.5 scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (57.6 vs 22.6). Claude Opus 5.5 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Claude Opus 5.5Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input price / 1M$4.00$0.06
Output price / 1M$20.00$0.18
Blended price (3:1)$8.00$0.09
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.012
Context window1M262K
Max output128K236K
Intelligence index57.622.6
Coding index55.6
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-09-222026-08-27
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 88.9× cheaper than Claude Opus 5.5 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Opus 5.5: 1,000,000 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Opus 5.5 ≈ $18,000, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons