DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash

DeepSeek

$0.14 / $0.42

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI

$0.06 / $0.18

Input / Output · per 1M tokens

Compare different models

Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 2.3× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. DeepSeek V4.1 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (39.5 vs 22.6). DeepSeek V4.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).

	DeepSeek V4.1 Flash	Ling 3.0 Flash Fin
Input price / 1M	$0.14	$0.06
Output price / 1M	$0.42	$0.18
Blended price (3:1)	$0.21	$0.09
Cached input / 1M	$0.0042	$0.012
Context window	1M	262K
Max output	131K	236K
Intelligence index	39.5	22.6
Coding index	—	55.6
Providers	26	—
Best provider uptime (30m)	100.0%	—
Vision input	Yes	No
Reasoning	Yes	Yes
Tool calling	Yes	Yes
Released	2026-09-10	2026-08-27
Retirement	—	—

Cost calculator

Input tokens / requestOutput tokens / requestRequests / day

FAQ

Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash or Ling 3.0 Flash Fin?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 2.3× cheaper than DeepSeek V4.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: which has a bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ≈ $490.00, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $210.00.

More comparisons