Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs LongCat 2.0

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

I

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin

inclusionAI
$0.06 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

LongCat 2.0

Meituan
$0.30 / $1.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
I
M
Verdict: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 5.8× cheaper than LongCat 2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Ling 3.0 Flash Fin scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (22.6 vs 19.1). LongCat 2.0 has the larger context window (1M vs 262K).
Ling 3.0 Flash FinLongCat 2.0
Input price / 1M$0.06$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.18$1.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.09$0.52
Cached input / 1M$0.012$0.006
Context window262K1M
Max output236K262K
Intelligence index22.619.1
Coding index55.645.3
Providers
Best provider uptime (30m)
Vision inputNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-272026-07-20
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Ling 3.0 Flash Fin or LongCat 2.0?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin is 5.8× cheaper than LongCat 2.0 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin vs LongCat 2.0: which has a bigger context window?

Ling 3.0 Flash Fin: 262,144 tokens. LongCat 2.0: 1,048,756 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Ling 3.0 Flash Fin ≈ $210.00, LongCat 2.0 ≈ $1,200.

More comparisons