LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Liquid

LFM2.5-24B-A2B

Liquid
$0.05 / $0.70
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Xiaomi

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Xiaomi
$0.14 / $0.28
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Liquid
Xiaomi
Verdict: MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 18% cheaper than LFM2.5-24B-A2B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiMo-V2.6-Flash has the larger context window (1.1M vs 128K).
LFM2.5-24B-A2BMiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input price / 1M$0.05$0.14
Output price / 1M$0.70$0.28
Blended price (3:1)$0.21$0.18
Cached input / 1M$0.025$0.0028
Context window128K1.1M
Max output8K131K
Intelligence index—26.7
Coding index——
Providers—10
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-132026-09-21
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, LFM2.5-24B-A2B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 18% cheaper than LFM2.5-24B-A2B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash: which has a bigger context window?

LFM2.5-24B-A2B: 128,000 tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash: 1,050,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: LFM2.5-24B-A2B ≈ $450.00, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ≈ $420.00.

More comparisons