GPT-6.1 Terra vs LFM2.5-24B-A2B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: LFM2.5-24B-A2B is 9.4× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Terra has the larger context window (1.1M vs 128K).
| GPT-6.1 Terra | LFM2.5-24B-A2B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $1.00 | $0.05 |
| Output price / 1M | $5.00 | $0.70 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $2.00 | $0.21 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.05 | $0.025 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 128K |
| Max output | 128K | 8K |
| Intelligence index | 51 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 4 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-10-26 | 2026-10-13 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Terra or LFM2.5-24B-A2B?
LFM2.5-24B-A2B is 9.4× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Terra on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6.1 Terra vs LFM2.5-24B-A2B: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6.1 Terra: 1,050,000 tokens. LFM2.5-24B-A2B: 128,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6.1 Terra ≈ $4,500, LFM2.5-24B-A2B ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Terra vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-6.1 Terra vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-6.1 Terra vs Mistral Large 4GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6.1 SolGPT-6.1 Terra vs Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 Terra vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6.1 Terra vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6.1 Terra vs Command A+GPT-6.1 Terra vs GPT-6 Luna ProLFM2.5-24B-A2B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProLFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Kimi K3.1 ProLFM2.5-24B-A2B vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashLFM2.5-24B-A2B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLLFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Gemini 4 ArgonLFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Claude Haiku 5.5LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs Nano Banana 2.1