LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Liquid

LFM2.5-24B-A2B

Liquid
$0.05 / $0.70
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
MiniMax

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiniMax
$0.15 / $0.60
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Liquid
MiniMax
Verdict: LFM2.5-24B-A2B is 19% cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. MiniMax M3.1 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 128K).
LFM2.5-24B-A2BMiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input price / 1M$0.05$0.15
Output price / 1M$0.70$0.60
Blended price (3:1)$0.21$0.26
Cached input / 1M$0.025$0.015
Context window128K1M
Max output8K524K
Intelligence index—28.9
Coding index——
Providers—14
Best provider uptime (30m)—100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-10-132026-10-19
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, LFM2.5-24B-A2B or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

LFM2.5-24B-A2B is 19% cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

LFM2.5-24B-A2B vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash: which has a bigger context window?

LFM2.5-24B-A2B: 128,000 tokens. MiniMax M3.1 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: LFM2.5-24B-A2B ≈ $450.00, MiniMax M3.1 Flash ≈ $600.00.

More comparisons