Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

T

Hy-MT2-1.8B

Tencent
$0.044 / $0.18
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
T
N
Verdict: Hy-MT2-1.8B is 2.6× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has the larger context window (131K vs 8K).
Hy-MT2-1.8BNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.044$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.18$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.0772$0.20
Cached input / 1M
Context window8K131K
Max output4K118K
Intelligence index
Coding index
Providers11
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputNoYes
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoNo
Released2026-08-202026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Hy-MT2-1.8B or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Hy-MT2-1.8B is 2.6× cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Hy-MT2-1.8B vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

Hy-MT2-1.8B: 8,192 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Hy-MT2-1.8B ≈ $176.50, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons