GPT-6.1 Sol vs Pareto 26.10
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Pareto 26.10 is 2.9× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GPT-6.1 Sol has the larger context window (1.1M vs 1M).
| GPT-6.1 Sol | Pareto 26.10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $2.00 | $0.80 |
| Output price / 1M | $10.00 | $3.20 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $4.00 | $1.40 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.10 | $0.03 |
| Context window | 1.1M | 1M |
| Max output | 128K | 131K |
| Intelligence index | 54.5 | — |
| Coding index | — | — |
| Providers | 9 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-09-29 | 2026-10-15 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GPT-6.1 Sol or Pareto 26.10?
Pareto 26.10 is 2.9× cheaper than GPT-6.1 Sol on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Pareto 26.10: which has a bigger context window?
GPT-6.1 Sol: 1,050,000 tokens. Pareto 26.10: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GPT-6.1 Sol ≈ $9,000, Pareto 26.10 ≈ $3,200.
More comparisons
GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGPT-6.1 Sol vs Kimi K3.1 ProGPT-6.1 Sol vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGPT-6.1 Sol vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GPT-6.1 Sol vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGPT-6.1 Sol vs Gemini 4 ArgonGPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Haiku 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol vs Nano Banana 2.1GPT-6.1 Sol vs Mistral Large 4GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Sonnet 5.5GPT-6.1 Sol vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGPT-6.1 Sol vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGPT-6.1 Sol vs Command A+GPT-6.1 Sol vs GPT-6 Luna ProPareto 26.10 vs GPT-6.1 TerraPareto 26.10 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProPareto 26.10 vs Kimi K3.1 ProPareto 26.10 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashPareto 26.10 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Pareto 26.10 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLPareto 26.10 vs Gemini 4 ArgonPareto 26.10 vs Claude Haiku 5.5