GLM 5.3 Flash vs Weaver (alpha)

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
M

Weaver (alpha)

Mancer
$0.30 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
M
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 7.1× cheaper than Weaver (alpha) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 8K).
GLM 5.3 FlashWeaver (alpha)
Input price / 1M$0.0399$0.30
Output price / 1M$0.0784$0.50
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$0.35
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.30
Context window1M8K
Max output131K6K
Intelligence index27.8—
Coding index71.5—
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-08-262023-08-02
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Weaver (alpha)?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 7.1× cheaper than Weaver (alpha) on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Weaver (alpha): which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Weaver (alpha): 8,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Weaver (alpha) ≈ $850.00.

More comparisons