GLM 5.3 Flash vs Relace Search
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 30.3× cheaper than Relace Search on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Relace Search | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0399 | $1.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0784 | $3.00 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0495 | $1.50 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 256K |
| Max output | 131K | 128K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | — |
| Providers | 42 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2025-12-08 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Relace Search?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 30.3× cheaper than Relace Search on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Relace Search: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Relace Search: 256,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Relace Search ≈ $3,500.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Relace Search vs Gemini 4 CarbonRelace Search vs Claude Fable 5.2Relace Search vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashRelace Search vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashRelace Search vs Hy4Relace Search vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalRelace Search vs GPT-6.1 TerraRelace Search vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro