Claude Fable 5.2 vs Relace Search

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Relace

Relace Search

Relace
$1.00 / $3.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
Relace
Verdict: Relace Search is 10.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 256K).
Claude Fable 5.2Relace Search
Input price / 1M$8.00$1.00
Output price / 1M$40.00$3.00
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$1.50
Cached input / 1M$0.20—
Context window1M256K
Max output128K128K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072025-12-08
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Relace Search?

Relace Search is 10.7× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Relace Search: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Relace Search: 256,000 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Relace Search ≈ $3,500.

More comparisons