GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Q

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.26 / $2.08
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
Q
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 3.0× cheaper than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash scores higher on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index (41.8 vs 15.6). GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 262K).
GLM 5.3 FlashQwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.26
Output price / 1M$0.50$2.08
Blended price (3:1)$0.24$0.72
Cached input / 1M$0.05
Context window1.3M262K
Max output944K66K
Intelligence index41.815.6
Coding index71.545.7
Providers31
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-02-25
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 3.0× cheaper than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ≈ $1,560.

More comparisons