Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Google

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash

Google
$1.50 / $9.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.26 / $2.08
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Google
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 4.7× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B has the larger context window (262K vs 131K).
Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3.5-122B-A10B
Input price / 1M$1.50$0.26
Output price / 1M$9.00$2.08
Blended price (3:1)$3.38$0.72
Cached input / 1M——
Context window131K262K
Max output66K66K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—45.7
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingNoYes
Released2026-11-042026-02-25
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B is 4.7× cheaper than Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: which has a bigger context window?

Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash: 131,072 tokens. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: 262,144 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash ≈ $7,500, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B ≈ $1,560.

More comparisons