GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3 32B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 2.6× cheaper than Qwen3 32B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3 32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0399 | $0.08 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0784 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0495 | $0.13 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 131K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | 15.3 |
| Providers | 42 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2025-04-28 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3 32B?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 2.6× cheaper than Qwen3 32B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3 32B: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 32B: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Qwen3 32B ≈ $300.00.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Qwen3 32B vs Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3 32B vs Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3 32B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3 32B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3 32B vs Hy4Qwen3 32B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3 32B vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3 32B vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro