Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3 32B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: Qwen3 32B is 123.1× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Claude Fable 5.2 has the larger context window (1M vs 131K).
| Claude Fable 5.2 | Qwen3 32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $8.00 | $0.08 |
| Output price / 1M | $40.00 | $0.28 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $16.00 | $0.13 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.20 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 131K |
| Max output | 128K | 16K |
| Intelligence index | 64.6 | — |
| Coding index | — | 15.3 |
| Providers | 5 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-11-07 | 2025-04-28 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Qwen3 32B?
Qwen3 32B is 123.1× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Qwen3 32B: which has a bigger context window?
Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Qwen3 32B: 131,072 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Qwen3 32B ≈ $300.00.
More comparisons
Claude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 CarbonClaude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashClaude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.2 vs Hy4Claude Fable 5.2 vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalClaude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 TerraClaude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProClaude Fable 5.2 vs Kimi K3.1 ProClaude Fable 5.2 vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashClaude Fable 5.2 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLClaude Fable 5.2 vs Gemini 4 ArgonClaude Fable 5.2 vs Claude Haiku 5.5Claude Fable 5.2 vs Nano Banana 2.1Claude Fable 5.2 vs Mistral Large 4Claude Fable 5.2 vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProQwen3 32B vs Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3 32B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3 32B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3 32B vs Hy4Qwen3 32B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3 32B vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3 32B vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProQwen3 32B vs Kimi K3.1 Pro