GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3 14B
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 2.6× cheaper than Qwen3 14B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 41K).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0399 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0784 | $0.22 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0495 | $0.13 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 41K |
| Max output | 131K | 37K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | 13.8 |
| Providers | 42 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2025-04-28 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Qwen3 14B?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 2.6× cheaper than Qwen3 14B on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3 14B: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 14B: 40,960 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Qwen3 14B ≈ $310.00.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Qwen3 14B vs Gemini 4 CarbonQwen3 14B vs Claude Fable 5.2Qwen3 14B vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashQwen3 14B vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashQwen3 14B vs Hy4Qwen3 14B vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3 14B vs GPT-6.1 TerraQwen3 14B vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro