GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal vs Qwen3 14B

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.37 / $1.25
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
Qwen (Alibaba)

Qwen3 14B

Qwen (Alibaba)
$0.10 / $0.22
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
Qwen (Alibaba)
Verdict: Qwen3 14B is 4.5× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal has the larger context window (1M vs 41K).
GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalQwen3 14B
Input price / 1M$0.37$0.10
Output price / 1M$1.25$0.22
Blended price (3:1)$0.59$0.13
Cached input / 1M$0.075—
Context window1M41K
Max output131K37K
Intelligence index——
Coding index—13.8
Providers1—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-022025-04-28
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal or Qwen3 14B?

Qwen3 14B is 4.5× cheaper than GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal vs Qwen3 14B: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal: 1,048,576 tokens. Qwen3 14B: 40,960 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 FlashX Legal ≈ $1,365, Qwen3 14B ≈ $310.00.

More comparisons