GLM 5.3 Flash vs Pareto 26.10 Preview

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z.ai (Zhipu)

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.0399 / $0.0784
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto 26.10 Preview

Unbiased
$0.80 / $3.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z.ai (Zhipu)
U
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 28.3× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 Preview on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 FlashPareto 26.10 Preview
Input price / 1M$0.0399$0.80
Output price / 1M$0.0784$3.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.0495$1.40
Cached input / 1M$0.03$0.03
Context window1M1M
Max output131K131K
Intelligence index27.8—
Coding index71.5—
Providers42—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-08-262026-10-01
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Pareto 26.10 Preview?

GLM 5.3 Flash is 28.3× cheaper than Pareto 26.10 Preview on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Pareto 26.10 Preview: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Pareto 26.10 Preview: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Pareto 26.10 Preview ≈ $3,200.

More comparisons