Claude Fable 5.2 vs Pareto 26.10 Preview

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Anthropic

Claude Fable 5.2

Anthropic
$8.00 / $40.00
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
U

Pareto 26.10 Preview

Unbiased
$0.80 / $3.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Anthropic
U
Verdict: Pareto 26.10 Preview is 11.4× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. Pareto 26.10 Preview has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
Claude Fable 5.2Pareto 26.10 Preview
Input price / 1M$8.00$0.80
Output price / 1M$40.00$3.20
Blended price (3:1)$16.00$1.40
Cached input / 1M$0.20$0.03
Context window1M1M
Max output128K131K
Intelligence index64.6—
Coding index——
Providers5—
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%—
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesNo
Tool callingYesYes
Released2026-11-072026-10-01
Retirement——

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.2 or Pareto 26.10 Preview?

Pareto 26.10 Preview is 11.4× cheaper than Claude Fable 5.2 on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Pareto 26.10 Preview: which has a bigger context window?

Claude Fable 5.2: 1,000,000 tokens. Pareto 26.10 Preview: 1,048,576 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: Claude Fable 5.2 ≈ $36,000, Pareto 26.10 Preview ≈ $3,200.

More comparisons