GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Price, context window & benchmark comparison

Z

GLM 5.3 Flash

Z.ai (Zhipu)
$0.15 / $0.50
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
VS
N

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

NVIDIA
$0.20 / $0.20
Input / Output · per 1M tokens
Compare different models
Z
N
Verdict: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 16% cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix. GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1.3M vs 131K).
GLM 5.3 FlashNemotron 3.5 Content Safety
Input price / 1M$0.15$0.20
Output price / 1M$0.50$0.20
Blended price (3:1)$0.24$0.20
Cached input / 1M$0.05
Context window1.3M131K
Max output944K118K
Intelligence index41.8
Coding index71.5
Providers311
Best provider uptime (30m)100.0%
Vision inputYesYes
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesNo
Released2026-08-262026-06-04
Retirement

Cost calculator

FAQ

Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety is 16% cheaper than GLM 5.3 Flash on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.

GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: which has a bigger context window?

GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,310,720 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: 131,072 tokens.

How much would 1 million requests cost?

At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $550.00, Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety ≈ $500.00.

More comparisons