GLM 5.3 Flash vs Muse Ember
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash is 4.0× cheaper than Muse Ember on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Muse Ember | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0399 | $0.10 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0784 | $0.50 |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0495 | $0.20 |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | $0.004 |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 131K | 944K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | — |
| Providers | 42 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2026-11-09 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Muse Ember?
GLM 5.3 Flash is 4.0× cheaper than Muse Ember on a typical 3:1 input/output mix.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Muse Ember: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Muse Ember: 1,048,576 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, Muse Ember ≈ $450.00.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4Muse Ember vs Gemini 4 CarbonMuse Ember vs Claude Fable 5.2Muse Ember vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashMuse Ember vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashMuse Ember vs Hy4Muse Ember vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalMuse Ember vs GPT-6.1 TerraMuse Ember vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro