GLM 5.3 Flash vs Jev Router
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs 1M).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | Jev Router | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.013 | — |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0168 | — |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.014 | — |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.0119 | — |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Max output | 944K | 66K |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | — |
| Providers | 40 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2026-09-25 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or Jev Router?
GLM 5.3 Flash and Jev Router are priced identically.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Jev Router: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. Jev Router: 1,000,000 tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $34.40, Jev Router ≈ $0.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Sol ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 SolGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Qwen3.8 Max PrimeGLM 5.3 Flash vs Command A+Jev Router vs GPT-6.1 TerraJev Router vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProJev Router vs Kimi K3.1 ProJev Router vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashJev Router vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017Jev Router vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLJev Router vs Gemini 4 ArgonJev Router vs Claude Haiku 5.5