GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT Image 2.6 Flare
Price, context window & benchmark comparison
VS
Compare different models
Verdict: GLM 5.3 Flash has the larger context window (1M vs —).
| GLM 5.3 Flash | GPT Image 2.6 Flare | |
|---|---|---|
| Input price / 1M | $0.0399 | $5.00 |
| Output price / 1M | $0.0784 | — |
| Blended price (3:1) | $0.0495 | — |
| Cached input / 1M | $0.03 | $1.25 |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Intelligence index | 27.8 | — |
| Coding index | 71.5 | — |
| Providers | 42 | — |
| Best provider uptime (30m) | 100.0% | — |
| Vision input | Yes | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No |
| Released | 2026-08-26 | 2026-11-04 |
| Retirement | — | — |
Cost calculator
FAQ
Which is cheaper, GLM 5.3 Flash or GPT Image 2.6 Flare?
GLM 5.3 Flash and GPT Image 2.6 Flare are priced identically.
GLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT Image 2.6 Flare: which has a bigger context window?
GLM 5.3 Flash: 1,048,576 tokens. GPT Image 2.6 Flare: — tokens.
How much would 1 million requests cost?
At 2,000 input + 500 output tokens per request: GLM 5.3 Flash ≈ $119.00, GPT Image 2.6 Flare ≈ $10,000.
More comparisons
GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 CarbonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Fable 5.2GLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs Hy4GLM 5.3 Flash vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 TerraGLM 5.3 Flash vs GPT-6.1 Terra ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs Kimi K3.1 ProGLM 5.3 Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 FlashGLM 5.3 Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VLGLM 5.3 Flash vs Gemini 4 ArgonGLM 5.3 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5GLM 5.3 Flash vs Nano Banana 2.1GLM 5.3 Flash vs Mistral Large 4GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini 4 CarbonGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Claude Fable 5.2GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini Omni 1.2 FlashGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Gemini Omni 1.1 FlashGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs Hy4GPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GLM 5.3 FlashX LegalGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GPT-6.1 TerraGPT Image 2.6 Flare vs GPT-6.1 Terra Pro